Complications: general

Reporting of adverse effects and reactions

In November 1996, the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme was launched. This voluntary and anonymized reporting scheme collects data from participating hospitals across the UK and Ireland. The purpose of SHOT is to collect data on serious morbidity related to the transfusion of blood and blood products. This data has since been used to inform education programmes, policy development and guideline development, ultimately improving hospital transfusion practice. SHOT also monitors the effect of its recommendations (Bolton‐Maggs [27]).
Although the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations ([34]) have now made the reporting of such events via SABRE mandatory, the SHOT scheme remains active and important and has presented yearly retrospective reports of data collected since its inception. These data demonstrate improved performance in recognizing reporting of transfusion‐related incidents and continues to generate key recommendations to improve all transfusion practice. Despite significant improvement in the reduction of risk from transfusion‐transmitted infection, human error that results in an incorrect blood component transfusion (IBCT) (i.e. the transfusion of a blood product that is not suitable for or not intended for the recipient) remains one of the greatest risks to patients. Figures from the 2017 SHOT report indicate that there were 307 cases in this category (Bolton‐Maggs [27]). SHOT provided a risk assessment per 100,000 blood components issued: the risk of death was 1 in 114,000 and the risk of serious harm was 1 in 21,000 (Bolton‐Maggs [27]).
The prompt management of any adverse transfusion reaction can reduce associated morbidity and can be life saving. Therefore, staff caring for patients receiving transfused products must be fully familiar with the immediate management of any suspected reaction (Box 12.11). However, specialist advice should always be sought regarding the diagnosis and ongoing management of transfusion reactions, such as haemolytic, anaphylactic and septic reactions (Robinson et al. [236], Tinegate et al. [270]).
Box 12.11
Initial management of a suspected transfusion reaction
  • Stop the transfusion and seek urgent medical help.
  • Initiate appropriate emergency procedures, for example call the resuscitation team.
  • Depending on venous access, withdraw the contents of the lumen being used and disconnect the blood product.
  • Keep venous access patent.
  • Confirm the patient's identity and recheck their details against the product compatibility label.
  • Keep the patient and relatives informed of all progress and reassure them as indicated.
  • Initiate close and frequent observations of temperature, pulse, blood pressure and fluid balance.
  • Inform the transfusion laboratory and seek the urgent advice of the haematologist for further management.
  • Return the transfused product to the laboratory with new blood samples (10 mL clotted and 5 mL ethylenediamine tetra‐acetic acid from the patient's opposite arm) (Tinegate et al. [270]) with a completed transfusion reaction notification form (if available) or note the patient's details, the nature and timing of the reaction, and the details of the component transfused.

Transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease

Although rare, transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease (TA‐GVHD) is a serious complication and is often fatal. TA‐GVHD is usually caused by an IBCT incident where non‐irradiated blood components containing immunocompetent T lymphocytes are given to severely immunocompromised recipients. The donor T lymphocytes engraft and multiply, reacting against the recipient's ‘foreign’ tissue, causing a graft‐versus‐host reaction (Norfolk [202]). Onset occurs 1–2 weeks after transfusion (maximum 30 days) and the condition is predominantly fatal (Norfolk [202]). Irradiation (25 gray) of blood and cellular blood components (not required for non‐cellular components such as fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate), to inactivate T lymphocytes (Norfolk [202]), is essential in the prevention of TA‐GVHD and is especially important in the following recipients:
  • foetuses receiving intrauterine transfusions
  • patients undergoing or having undergone blood or bone marrow progenitor cell transplantation
  • immunocompromised recipients
  • patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • patients who have received purine analogues, e.g. fludarabine.
At present, the guidelines are being reviewed for patients receiving T‐cell‐depleted agents such as alemtuzumab for non‐haematological indications. However, while this review is underway, the British Committee for Standards in Haematology recommends that these patients receive irradiated blood components (Treleaven et al. [273]).

Bacterial infections

Contamination of blood and blood components can occur during donation, collection, processing, storage and administration. Despite strict guidelines and procedures, the risk of contamination remains. The most common contaminating organisms are skin contaminants such as staphylococci, diphtheroids and micrococci, which enter the blood at the time of venesection (Barbara and Contreras [13], Provan et al. [224]). Bacterial contamination can lead to severe septic reaction. Two strategies have been implemented by NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) to reduce bacterial infections: donor arm disinfection and the diversion of the first 30 mL of each donation to reduce contamination of the blood component by the skin plug from venepuncture. Since 1996, 44 confirmed bacterial infections have been reported to SHOT, 37 of these related to platelet transfusions (Narayan [172]). NHSBT implemented bacterial screening in January 2011, and aerobic and anaerobic cultures are performed on each platelet collection (NHSBT [187]).

Viral infections

Many viral infections have been well controlled by combinations of screening the donor, improvements in testing and good manufacturing practice (Katz and Dodd [123], Norfolk [202]). Despite a now low incidence, vigilance must remain for new viruses that may emerge and compromise transfusion safety (Katz and Dodd [123], Norfolk [202]). Plasma‐borne viruses include hepatitis A (rarely), hepatitis B, hepatitis C, hepatitis E, serum parvovirus B19, and human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV‐1 and HIV‐2). Cell‐associated viruses include cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein–Barr virus, human T‐cell leukaemia/lymphoma viruses (HTLV‐1 and HTLV‐2), and HIV‐1 and HIV‐2. Since 1996 there have been 34 viral transfusion‐transmitted infections, involving 41 recipients, confirmed and reported to SHOT (Narayan [172]). In 2017, both the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service and NHSBT implemented 100% screening of all blood donations for hepatitis E. SHOT reported one confirmed case of hepatitis E transmission from transfusion in 2018 (Narayan [172]).

Human T‐cell leukaemia/lymphoma virus type 1 (HTLV‐1)

HTLV‐1 is an oncogenic retrovirus associated with the white cells that cause adult T‐cell leukaemia and is connected with several degenerative neuromuscular syndromes. Screening using the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been recommended because of concerns relating to the transmission of the virus via blood transfusion and the associated long incubation period of adult T‐cell leukaemia. In 2017, NHSBT changed from universal HTLV screening to selective (for new donors and components that will not be leuco‐depleted) (Bolton‐Maggs [27]). Since the introduction of leucodepletion and screening, transmission of HTLV has been virtually eliminated (Norfolk [202]).

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)

CMV is classified as part of the herpes family and hence has the ability to remain latent within monocytes and dendritic cells and can then reactivate during periods of immunosuppression (Al‐Omari et al. [9]). Approximately 50% of the UK population have antibodies to CMV. Therefore, it is recognized that the virus may be transmitted by transfusion. Although it poses little threat to immunologically competent recipients, in vulnerable patient groups CMV infection can cause significant morbidity and mortality. In March 2012, the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs issued a position statement with guidance that the leucodepletion of blood components ‘provides a significant degree of CMV risk reduction’ (SaBTO [240], p.11). This risk reduction is considered adequate protection against transmission of CMV to the majority of patients, including haemopoietic stem cell transplant patients. It is recommend that if an intrauterine, neonate and/or elective transfusion during pregnancy is required that these patients receive CMV‐seronegative components (SaBTO [240]).

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)

Screening for hepatitis B (HBV) is conducted via nucleic acid testing (HBV NAT) (JPAC [121]). SHOT reported one probable and one indeterminate hepatitis B transfusion infection in 2018 (Narayan [172]).

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)

Screening for hepatitis C (HCV) is conducted via nucleic acid testing (HCV NAT) (JPAC [121]). HCV is transmitted primarily via contact with blood or blood products (Friedman [86]). The last reported HCV transfusion‐transmitted infection occurred in 1997 (Bolton‐Maggs [27]).

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV‐1 and HIV‐2)

HIV is a retrovirus that infects and kills helper T‐cells, also known as CD4‐positive lymphocytes. The virus can be transmitted via most blood products, including red cells, platelets, FFP, and factor VIII and IX concentrates. These viruses are not known to be transmitted in albumin, immunoglobulins or antithrombin III products (Barbara and Contreras [13]). The retrovirus invades cells and slowly destroys the immune system, rendering the individual susceptible to opportunistic infections. Since 1983, when it was recognized that the virus could be transmitted via transfusion, actions have been developed to safeguard blood supplies from transmitting the virus that causes acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). These include the careful screening of donors and the testing of donated blood. The last transmission of HIV‐1 or HIV‐2 due to a blood transfusion occurred in 2002, before the introduction of NAT (nucleic acid testing) screening (Bolton‐Maggs [27]).

Other infective agents

Parasites

Plasmodium falciparum is the most dangerous of the human malarial parasites (Barbara and Contreras [13]). Prevention is maintained by questioning donors about foreign travel, in particular travel to areas where the disease is prevalent (Bishop [22]). The last parasite transfusion‐transmitted infection to be reported to SHOT occurred in 2003 (Bolton‐Maggs [27]).

Prion diseases

Known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), these are a rare group of conditions that cause progressive neurodegeneration in humans and some animal species (Box 12.12). Prion diseases are caused by the presence of an abnormal misfolded aggregated cellular protein (Sigurdson et al. [255]). Key characteristics of vCJD include an accumulation of protease‐resisitant prion protein in lymphoid tissue and the presence of ‘florid’ plaques on neuropathology (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [40]).
Box 12.12
Prion diseases

Prion diseases in animal species

  • Scrapie, a disease of sheep
  • Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)
  • Feline spongiform encephalopathy (FSE)
  • Chronic wasting disease of deer, mule and elk

Prion diseases in humans

  • Sporadic: classic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD)
  • Inherited: CJD, Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker syndrome, fatal familial insomnia (FFI)
  • Acquired: kuru, variant CJD (vCJD)
There is evidence to suggest that in TSEs, of which vCJD is one, leucocytes (particularly lymphocytes) are the key cells in transportation of the putative infectious agent to the brain; therefore, as a risk reduction measure, leucodepletion of blood components was introduced in 1999 (Norfolk [202]). There were a total of 178 deaths in cases of definite or probable vCJD in the UK up to 31 December 2017. Analysis of the incidence of vCJD onsets and deaths from January 1994 to December 2011 indicates that a peak has passed (National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit [175]). While this is an encouraging finding, the incidence of vCJD may increase again, particularly if different genetic subgroups with longer incubation periods exist (National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit [175]).

Sepsis

Sepsis can occur as a result of bacteria entering the blood or blood component that is to be infused. The most common bacterial culprit is skin flora (Levy et al. [133]). The blood component that carries the largest risk of causing a bacterial infection is platelets (Bolton‐Maggs [27]). Bacteria can enter at any point from the time of collection, during storage through to administration to the patient.