Pre‐procedural considerations

Equipment

The following equipment may be used as part of a neurological assessment:
  • Pen torch: used to assess the reaction of the pupils to light and the consensual light reflex (Bickley [18]).
  • Tongue depressor: a device used to depress the tongue to allow for examination of the mouth and throat (Fuller [66]).
  • Patella hammer: a tendon hammer used to strike the patella tendon below the knee to assess the deep knee‐jerk/reflex (Fuller [66]).
  • Neuro tips: a sharp instrument (such as a safety pin or other suitable sharp object) used to apply pressure and test for superficial sensations to pain (Fuller [66]).
  • Snellen chart: a letter chart used to measure visual acuity (Bickley [18]).

Assessment and recording tools

The initial assessment of a patient should include a history (taken from relatives or friends if necessary) that notes changes in mood, intellect, memory and personality, since these may be indicators of a long‐standing problem (Baumann [16]).
Assessment of level of consciousness can be carried out using the GCS or the AVPU scale (Adam et al. [2]).

Glasgow Coma Scale

The GCS, first published by Teasdale and Jennett ([196]), is a widely used tool for assessing level of consciousness and should be employed to assess all patients with head injuries (NICE [139]). It forms a quick, objective and easily interpreted mode of neurological assessment (Braine and Cook [26]). The GCS measures arousal and awareness by assessing three areas of the patient's behaviour: eye opening, verbal response and motor response (Wilkinson et al. [215]). Each area is allocated a score, enabling objectivity, ease of recording and comparison between recordings (Baumann [16]). The sum provides a score out of 15, where a score of 15 indicates a fully alert and responsive patient and a score of 3 (the lowest possible score) indicates unconsciousness (Adam et al. [2]). When used consistently, the GCS provides a graphical representation that shows any improvement or deterioration of the patient's consciousness level at a glance (Figure 14.51; Table 14.21) (Adam et al. [2], Brain Trauma Foundation [25], Braine and Cook [26]). However, a thoughtful, educated approach is essential to enhance its coherency and practicality (Braine and Cook [26]).
Figure 14.51  Glasgow Coma Scale and neurological observations chart.
Table 14.21  Scoring activities of the GCS; the scores are summed, with the highest score (15) indicating full consciousness
CategoryScoreResponse
Eye opening
Spontaneous4Eyes open spontaneously without stimulation
To speech3Eyes open to verbal stimulation (normal, raised or repeated)
To pain2Eyes open with painful/noxious stimuli
None1No eye opening regardless of level of stimulation
Verbal response
Orientated5Able to give accurate information regarding time, person and place
Confused4Able to answer in sentences using correct language but cannot answer orientation questions appropriately
Inappropriate words3Uses incomprehensible words in a random or disorganized fashion
Incomprehensible sounds2Makes unintelligible sounds, for example moans and groans
None1No verbal response despite verbal or other stimuli
Best motor response
Obeys commands6Obeys and can repeat simple commands, for example arm raise
Localizes to pain5Purposeful movement to remove painful stimuli
Normal flexion4Withdraws extremity from source of pain, for example flexes arm at elbow without wrist rotation in response to painful stimuli
Abnormal flexion3Decorticate posturing (flexion of arms, hyperextension of legs) spontaneously or in response to noxious stimuli
Extension2Decerebrate posturing (limbs extended and internally rotated) spontaneously or in response to noxious stimuli
None1No response to noxious stimuli; flaccid limbs
Source: Adapted from Baumann ([16]).
A limitation in the use of the GCS is that most healthcare professions will require the scale to be available for review in order to score a patient's consciousness level (as very few healthcare professions have memorized the scores for each area of assessment) (Reith et al. [174]). In an urgent or highly acute situation, this may not be possible, in which case the AVPU method may be more appropriate (see below) (RCUK [173]).
Assessment using the GCS involves three phases (Baumann [16]):
  • evaluation of eye opening
  • evaluation of verbal response
  • evaluation of motor response.

Evaluation of eye opening

Eye opening indicates that the arousal mechanism in the brain is active (Fuller [66]). Eye opening may occur spontaneously, in response to speech, in response to a painful stimulus or not at all (Baumann [16]). Arousal (eye opening) is always the first measurement undertaken when performing the GCS, as without arousal, cognition cannot occur (Baumann [16], Brunker and Harris [32]). Eye opening is scored as follows:
  • Spontaneous: the patient is observed to be awake, with their eyes open, without any speech or touch (allocated a score of 4).
  • To speech: the patient opens their eyes to loud and clear commands (allocated a score of 3).
  • To pain: the patient opens their eyes to a painful stimulus (allocated a score of 2).
  • None: the patient does not open their eyes to a painful stimulus (allocated a score of 1) (Baumann [16], Brunker and Harris [32], Fuller [66]).
A patient with flaccid ocular muscles may lie with their eyes open all the time; this is not a true arousal response and should be recorded as ‘none’ (Fuller [66]). If a patient's eyes are closed as a result of swelling or facial fractures, eye opening cannot be used to determine a falling consciousnes level; this should be recorded as a ‘C’ (closed) on the chart (Brunker and Harris [32], Fuller [66]).

Evaluation of verbal response

Verbal response is scored as follows:
  • Orientated: the patient can correctly identify who they are (person), where they are (place) and the current year (time) (allocated a score of 5).
  • Confused: the patient's responses to the above questions are incorrect and they are unaware of person, place or time (allocated a score of 4).
  • Inappropriate words: the patient responds using intelligible words that are unsuitable as conversational responses; swearing is common, as are single‐word responses (allocated a score of 3).
  • Incomprehensible: the patient may mumble, moan or groan without recognizable words (allocated a score of 2).
  • Absent: the patient does not speak or make sounds at all (allocated a score of 1) (Baumann [16], Brunker and Harris [32], Fuller [66]).
The absence of speech may not always indicate a falling level of consciousness; for example, the patient may not speak English but may still be able to speak. A patient with a tracheostomy or endotracheal tube should be recorded as ‘T’ on the chart under no response and allocated a score of 1 (Baumann [16]). Likewise, if the patient is dysphasic, the best verbal response cannot be determined accurately. The patient may have a motor (expressive) dysphasia and therefore be able to understand but be unable to find the right word, or a sensory (receptive) dysphasia, which means they will be unable to comprehend what is being said to them (Fuller [66]). At times, patients with expressive dysphasia may also have receptive problems; therefore, it is important to make an early referral to a speech and language therapist. This should be recorded as a ‘D’ on the chart under no response and allocated a score of 1 (Baumann [16]).
If a patient cannot follow an instruction due to a language barrier or unconsciousness, observe their spontaneous movements and note how strong they appear to be (Adam et al. [2]). Then, if necessary, apply painful stimuli (Fuller [66]). The nurse should also consider that some patients may need a lot of stimulation to maintain their concentration to answer questions, even though they can answer them correctly (Brunker and Harris [32]). It is therefore important to note the amount of stimulation that the patient required as part of the baseline assessment (Baumann [16]).

Evaluation of motor response

Motor response is the most important prognostic aspect of the GCS after traumatic brain injury (Adam et al. [2]). To obtain an accurate picture of brain function, motor response is tested by using the upper limbs because responses in the lower limbs reflect spinal function (Adam et al. [2]). The patient should be asked to obey a couple of simple commands; for example, they can be asked to squeeze the nurses hands (both sides). The nurse should note the power in the hands and the patient's ability to release the grip in order to discount a reflex action (Brain Trauma Foundation [25]). In addition, the patient should be asked to raise their eyebrows or stick out their tongue, and the best motor response should be recorded (Bickley [18]). If movement is spontaneous, the nurse should note which limbs move and whether the movement is purposeful (Fuller [66]). If the patient is able to obey commands, they should be allocated a score of 6 (Baumann [16]).
If the patient is unresponsive to simple commands, their response to painful stimuli should be assessed. This may be:
  • Localized: the patient moves their hand to the site of the stimulus – either up beyond the chin or across the midline of the body (allocated a score of 5).
  • Normal flexion: no localization is seen; instead, the patient bends their arms at the elbow in response to painful stimuli. This is a rapid response associated with abduction of the shoulder (allocated a score of 4).
  • Abnormal flexion: internal rotation, adduction of the shoulder and flexion of the elbow in response to painful stimuli. This is much slower than normal flexion and may be accompanied by spastic flexion of the wrist (allocated a score of 3) (Figure 14.52).
  • Extension: no abnormal flexion is seen. The patient has straightening of the elbow joint, adduction and internal rotation of the shoulder, and inward rotation and spastic flexion of the wrist limb in response to painful stimuli (allocated a score of 2) (Figure 14.52).
  • Flaccid/none: no motor response is seen at all in response to painful stimuli (allocated a score of 1) (Brain Trauma Foundation [25]).
image
Figure 14.52  Normal and abnormal flexion and extension.

The AVPU scale

The AVPU scale is a simple, rapid and effective method for assessing consciousness and forms part of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) (RCP [172]). It is particularly useful during the rapid assessment of an acutely unwell patient (RCUK [173]).
AVPU is a mnemonic for a neurological scoring system that quantifies the patient's response to stimulation and assesses their level of consciousness (Brunker and Harris [32]). It stands for Alert, response to Voice, response to Pain or Unresponsive. Assessment using the AVPU method is done in sequence and only one outcome is recorded; for example, if the patient responds to voice, it is not necessary to assess the response to pain (Wilkinson et al. [215]):
  • Alert: a fully awake (although not necessarily orientated) patient. The patient has spontaneous opening of the eyes, responds to voice (although they may be confused) and has motor function.
  • Voice: the patient makes some kind of response when the assessor talks to them. The response can be in any of the three component measures of eyes, voice or motor. For example, the patient's eyes might open on being asked, ‘Are you OK?’. The response can be as small as a grunt, moan or slight movement of a limb when prompted by voice.
  • Pain: the patient makes a response to a pain stimulus. A patient who is not alert and who has not responded to voice is likely to exhibit only withdrawal from pain, or even involuntary flexion or extension of the limbs from the pain stimulus.
  • Unresponsive: commonly referred to as ‘unconscious’. This outcome is recorded if the patient does not give any eye, voice or motor response to voice or pain (RCP [171]).
Table 14.22  Prevention and resolution (Procedure guideline 14.9)
ProblemCausePreventionAction
Patient's speech difficulties or a language barrier make it difficult to conduct the assessmentLanguage barrier or dysphasiaEnsure adequate knowledge of methods of interacting with patients speech difficulties. Be aware of translation resources available.
Use an interpreter if there is a language barrier.
Use other communication tools (such as picture boards, signalling or allowing the patient to write) as necessary.
Patient not compliant with instructionsPatient is scared or frustrated or does not have a clear understanding of what is being askedTell the patient what you are doing and explain the procedure, whether they are conscious or not.Give details to the patient of what you will be asking, including examples of commands. Explain that some of these might seem unusual but are essential assessments of specific brain functions. If the patient's family are present, ask them not to answer any questions directed at the patient.
Unable to assess strength or movement of limbs due to spinal cord compression, fracture, cast, etc.InjuriesEnsure thorough knowledge of the patient's previous medical history and current clinical condition.If at all possible, assess the best response of each limb individually; otherwise chart N/A (not applicable) and record the reasons in the patient's medical notes.
Eyelids closed due to oedemaFluid overload, trauma, allergic reaction, clinical situation, etc.Knowledge of patient's previous medical history and current clinical condition.Attempt to open the patient's eyelids gently but do not force the eyelids open; otherwise record a ‘C’ for closed.