Chapter 17: Vascular access devices: insertion and management
Skip chapter table of contents and go to main content
Evidence‐based approaches
Rationale
A midline catheter offers an alternative to peripheral and central venous access. Where patients present with poor peripheral venous access and when the use of a central venous catheter (CVC) is contraindicated, a midline catheter provides venous accessibility along with easy, less hazardous insertion in veins of the upper arm, above the antecubital fossa (Dawson and Moureau [108], Mushtaq et al. [340], Weinstein and Hagle [465]). Because the tip of the catheter does not extend beyond the extremities in which it is placed, radiographic confirmation of tip placement is optional and recommended only when there is difficulty in insertion or flushing (Gorski and Czaplewski [180], Weinstein and Hagle [465]).
Midlines are experiencing a resurgence of attention and usage due to improvements in catheter materials and product development. Newer midline catheters are 8–10 cm in length and can be placed using a modified Seldinger technique (MST). Some models are all‐in‐one devices with the needle, wire and introducer in a combined unit for ease and speed of access; for these, the insertion technique referred to as accelerated Seldinger (AST) should be used (Moureau and Chopra [330]). The growing evidence to support the use of midlines demonstrates lower phlebitis rates than those for peripheral intravenous cannulas and lower rates of infection than those for CVCs (Caparas and Hu [61], Dawson and Moureau [108], Moureau and Chopra [330], Mushtaq et al. [340], Warrington et al. [462]). Other benefits to patients include less frequent re‐siting of peripheral intravenous cannulas and a subsequent reduction in associated venous trauma (Gorski and Czaplewski [180], Moureau and Chopra [330], Weinstein and Hagle [465]).
Indications
Midline catheters are indicated in the following circumstances:
- When patients do not have accessible peripheral veins in the lower arm.
- When patients will be undergoing therapy for 1–4 weeks (Carlson [62], Chopra et al. [77], Moureau and Chopra [330]), in order to preserve the integrity of the veins and increase patient comfort by removing the need for peripheral intravenous cannula re‐sites, for example antibiotics. Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) guidelines (Chopra et al. [77]) suggest the use of midlines for patients with peripherally compatible solution or medications where treatment will likely exceed 6 days (Chopra et al. [77], Moureau and Chopra [330]).
- When patients are considered DIVAs (Difficult Intravenous Access) and ultrasound‐guided peripheral access has failed (Moureau and Chopra [330]).
- Patient preference (Cummings et al. [95], Dougherty [124], Hadaway [194], Perucca [369]).
Contraindications
The following should not be used for administration via a midline catheter:
- vesicant medications, especially by continuous infusion
- parenteral nutrition
- solutions and/or medications with a pH of less than 5 or greater than 9
- solutions and/or medications with an osmolarity greater than 600 mOsmol/L (Chopra et al. [77], Gorski and Czaplewski [180], Gorski et al. [181], Hadaway [194], Moureau and Chopra [330], RCN [381]).
Methods of insertion
The insertion is performed via an introducer or using an MST (i.e. when venous access is established with a needle, a guidewire is threaded through the needle, the needle is removed, an introducer/peel‐away sheath is threaded over the guidewire, the guidewire and dilator are then removed, and the catheter is advanced into the venous system through the introducer/peel‐away sheath) (Hadaway [194], Weinstein and Hagle [465]). Newer all‐in‐one midlines follow an AST as the needle, guidewire and introducer are combined (Moureau and Chopra [330]). Adequate ultrasound assessment of the patient's veins is vital to ensure vessel patency, identify any thrombosis and assess the diameter of the vein to be cannulated (Alexandrou et al. [4], Gorski et al. [181]). Given the choice, the non‐dominant arm should be used (Alexandrou et al. [4]).