Chapter 20: Diagnostic investigations
Skip chapter table of contents and go to main content
Source: Adapted from Chernecky and Berger ([26]), EGTM ([46]).
Evidence‐based approaches
As there are over 200 cancer types with each having different but sometimes overlapping features, there is a variation in referral and testing for possible cancers. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE [112]) has produced evidence‐based guidance (NG12) for suspected cancers and their recognition and referral in children, young people and adults. Recommendations are presented by the site of the cancer. Further NICE ([108]) guidance (CG104) has been produced for malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO) and metastatic malignant disease of unknown primary origin in adults.
In 2013, the ACB made the following recommendations as a result of the ACB national audit on tumour marker service provision.
Laboratories should:
- adopt local guidelines for non‐specialist laboratories informing them of the most appropriate use of tumour markers that are based on nationally or internationally developed evidence‐based guidelines
- provide guidance on frequency of tumour marker measurement
- regularly audit their tumour marker service to review the requesting patterns and use
- review their tumour marker requests, in particular those sent to another laboratory assay
- state on reports for tumour markers measured on fluids that these results have not been validated
- state the relevant reference range on the report and that the results are not well defined and are to be only used for guidance
- state that a result out of the reference range does not imply tumour presence or exclude tumour presence
- state that benign conditions may cause elevated serum results that can lead to misinterpretation
- state that medication, medical intervention and lifestyle can influence results
- advise users that factors such as urinary tract infection (UTI), catheterization prior to serum PSA and correct time of serum PSA after digital rectal examination may affect the result (ACB [5]).
Rationale
Tumour markers are used in cancer detection and management. The tests are potentially useful in cancer screening, aiding diagnosis, determining prognosis, surveillance post curative surgery, predicting drug response or resistance and monitoring therapy in advanced disease (ACB [5], Duffy [39]). Tumour markers should only be requested where the results can influence clinical practice and have a favourable outcome for patients (ACB [5]).
Indications
The main indication for serum tumour marker testing is the monitoring of patients diagnosed with cancer.
- Primary care – the only tests that should be performed are PSA in males, CA 125 in females, and where the GP is following up a patient being cared for by a secondary physician.
- Asymptomatic patients – potentially used for screening in early malignancy.
- Symptomatic patients – to assist in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant disease, following diagnosis and surgical removal of a cancer to assess prognosis, post‐operative surveillance, therapy prediction, and monitoring the systemic therapy response (ACB [5], Duffy [39]; EGTM [46]).
- Metastatic malignant disease of unknown primary origin in adults: second diagnostic phase – only in the following:
- alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) in patients with germ cell tumours, particularly in young men with mediastinal and/or retroperitoneal masses
- AFP in patients with hepatocellular cancer
- PSA in men with prostate cancer
- CA 125 in women with ovarian cancer including inguinal node, chest, pleural, peritoneal or retroperitoneal presentations (NICE [108]).
Contraindications
There are certain circumstances where tumour markers should not be used. These include:
- metastatic malignant disease of unknown primary origin in adults: second diagnostic phase (NICE [108])
- patients with vague symptoms when likelihood of cancer is low (ACB [5])
- multiple tumour marker requests in the attempt to identify a primary cancer or the presence of secondary cancers; this is rarely valuable (ACB [5]).
Pre‐procedural considerations
There are various pre‐procedural considerations such as timing of specimen collection, other current treatment or medications, the patient's renal function, possible contamination of samples, type of specimen and the stability of the specimen during storage (Table 20.2).
Table 20.2 Pre‐analytical/pre‐procedural considerations
Consideration | Potential tumour markers affected |
---|---|
Timing of specimen collection |
|
Effects of other treatment/medication |
|
Effect of renal failure/impairment |
|
Effect of cholestasis |
|
Contamination with saliva |
|
Type of specimen |
|
Stability of specimen on storage |
|
B2M, beta‐2 microglobulin; PSA, prostate‐specific antigen; UTI, urinary tract infection. |
Equipment
The equipment required will vary depending on the type of specimen to be collected such as serum, urine or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Please refer to Chapter c13: Diagnostic tests for the various types of equipment and method required, for example blood test, urine collection, CSF collection. The collection vessels or containers may vary according to each organization or laboratory. It is therefore essential to identify the required collection vessels or containers.
Post‐procedural considerations
Ongoing care
It is important to ensure that the patient is informed in regards to the significance of the tumour marker results in the context of other clinical examinations and investigations. Refer to Chapter c05: Communication, psychological wellbeing and safeguarding.